fbpx Skip to main content
CALL US: 01482 323 697
Williamsons News

Brexit: An Employers Toolkit

31 January 2020

Immigration, News

Illegal working in the UK after Brexit: Rights and wrongs!

The Background: The Situation at Present:

At the moment: On the one hand, an employer can be fined up to £20,000 for employing an illegal worker in the UK; on the other there is no actual law stating that it is illegal not to perform right to work checks. (The only exception to this is employers holding Tier 2 Sponsor Licences.) So how can people make sense of this seemingly contradictory situation, better still apply it to their work force in actuality?

The law actually states:

that it is “unlawful for an employer to employ a person who is:

  • subject to UK immigration control; and
  • needs permission to perform the work in question; and
  • does not have such permission.”

[Immigration, Nationality and Asylum Act 2006]

Immigration - Williamsons SolicitorsSomeone who is subject to immigration control is defined in the Immigration Act 1971 as someone who needs leave to enter or remain in the UK. This, broadly (and currently), is anyone who is a national of a country outside of the EEA. UK and EEA nationals do not currently need leave to enter or remain, and therefore permission to work in the UK.

The law further defines those who do not have such permission, as above, as those:

  • who did not have leave (permission) to enter or remain in the UK;
  • whose leave has expired;
  • who were not allowed to do certain types of work (this includes visitors, or those with permission to work at a particular employer, and they started working for another etc);
  • who had papers that were incorrect or false.

So how does an employer, who is not an expert in Immigration law know how to protect themselves from this?

An employer can protect themselves by carrying out basic checks for anyone in their employ. It is lawful for them to ask anyone who works for them to bring in ID to prove their nationality/ immigration status and therefore show their ‘Right to work’ providing they are not  discriminating, see below.

Williamsons Solicitors - ImmigrationThe Home Office also now provide a ‘Right to work’ check. This is part of their new ‘Status checking scheme’ which is potentially going to be rolled out so that an individual’s immigration status can be checked in real time with authorised users, providing proof of entitlement to things like accommodation and the NHS amongst others. These new ‘Right to work’ checks were the first step in this scheme. The ‘Right to work’ check however has been described as notoriously slow by regular users and this can often be an issue with an employer who has a large workforce with a high turnover of staff.

Other employers will take staff from recruitment agencies, seemingly bypassing the need to do a ‘Right to work’ check. Businesses and organisations should be wary of this, however, as the definition of employee is not simply determined by whether an employee is called as such, and the Home Office are becoming wise to this, applying the term ‘employee’ by its strictest legal definition.

How can an employer perform ‘Right to work’ checks without discriminating?

 The employer must ensure that their policy regarding checking ID must apply to all groups of employees equally. This is the safest way to do this without breaching any laws regarding equality. It, therefore, does not raise questions about an employer discriminating against, for example: anyone who has a foreign accent; or non-white employees.

The situation after Brexit:

The transitional period

Often when there are significant changes to migration legislation or immigration rules in the UK there will be a transitional period put in place. This is to protect individuals (and indeed employers in some cases) relying on stability of their day to day lives, or stability of their workforce. It is also in keeping with the general tenet in UK law: That the law should be predictable to be able to be workable.

Williamsons Solicitors - ImmigrationGiven that Brexit will change the situation for so many European nationals seeking entry and ultimately settlement in the UK and so many UK businesses who rely on the workforce this brings, it is no surprise therefore that a core part of the Withdrawal Agreement Bill (the ‘WAB’) is regarding a “transition or implementation period” under Article 126. This period begins when the UK leaves the EU on 31st January 2020 and ends, by default, on 31 December 2020.

However the UK and EU can jointly agree, on a one-off basis, to extend that period by a further period of ‘up to two-years,’ under Article 132.

This initial transitional period has been confirmed by the House of Commons library as being unchanged between the October Withdrawal Agreement Bill and the newer Bill put forward in December 2019, which has now reached Royal Assent. The UK government have between now and 30 June 2020 to agree any extension to the transitional period, as defined above, which ends on 31 December 2020.

After the transitional period

After the transitional period, European Economic Area citizens (and their family members) will be subject to the same law that currently relates to non-EEA citizens, as above. They will be from then on defined as ‘subject to immigration control’ and it remains to be seen what might happen to them in relation to working in the UK. The Migration Advisory Committee (the UK government’s ‘go-to’ advisers on what might benefit the UK economy in relation to migration) are indicating the following, at first glance:

  • That the availability of low skilled workers will be fewer overall, leaving many industries potentially floundering after the transitional period;
  • That European workers will have to apply through the current Tier 2 sponsor system, widely renowned for being inefficient (at best);
  • That the Tier 2 salary threshold will be retained, but lowered from £30,000 to £25,600. Some argue this is not nearly low enough;
  • The cap which currently determines that there is a maximum number of people who can hold a Tier 2 visa at any one time, be scrapped to allow for more flexibility in the work force (a welcome change, if this happens);
  • Another welcome change is the suggestion of the scrapping of the Resident Labour Market Test (the ‘RLMT’), which currently requires that an employer must employ a European national (including UK national) before offering the job to non-European national workers. After the transitional period, this RLMT would require the employer to look for UK national workers before nationals from the rest of the world, including Europe. The main disadvantage of this is that it requires the job to be advertised ‘locally’ on job centre website pages for a period of 28 days before the job can be offered. This will frustrate the process of employment of many and seriously affect anyone with a high turnover of staff.

There are valid concerns from experts in various industries that there will just not be enough access to quick, lower skilled labour, such as: social care; the food industry; logistics; and the NHS. For the Humber, and in particular, North Lincolnshire, this could be devastating in relation to the food industry which heavily relies on available labour from Europeans.

Frances Ledbury - ImmigrationThere are other valid comments made regarding discrimination of women in the workforce: There is no allowance for the salary threshold to be pro-rated for part time workers, and this necessarily (due to the pattern of females in employment) has a discriminatory effect on the female work force.

It remains to be seen what labour ‘fall-out’ will come from Britain’s exit from the European Union and more exactly the Withdrawal Agreement Bill, but we will be watching closely from the sidelines, assisting our clients in order to maintain their work force as much as they can…

If you have any questions about any of the above issues raised or anything else regarding immigration, please do not hesitate to be in contact with our team or call our office on 01482 323697.

Contact Us Back to top
Read some reviews from our clients

4.90 Average

191 Reviews

Miss S

Excellent service from Beth Dyson despite all the pressures of the Covid lockdown. Beth carried out conveyancing of my sale and purchase very thoroughly and efficiently with good communication and always in a helpful and friendly manner. Many thanks.

Joanna H

Well from the moment I met Wayne Walker his professionalism,clarity of thought, and aim to do the best job he can were all evident. He has been involved with my family for five years nearly and has always made me feel as though my views were relevant and integral to furthering the case. Wayne has highly developed organisational skills and we always felt just ‘looked after’ by Wayne snd Williamsons in getting through the very worst of times. Wayne sometimes needed to encourage me to look at things from a different perspective and he always achieved this with firm kindness. Wayne is a great professional but more importantly a fundamentally great human being. I will always recommend Williamsons and especially on the subject of clinical negligence I will always recommend Wayne. Full job well done start to finish. Thanks Wayne there are no words. Jo Hogg (Polly’s mum)


Williamsons Solicitors supported our family to succeed to a very high level. We cannot thank Sarah Jackson enough for her incredible support, dedication and commitment to understanding the finest detail of our case. Her dedication was phonememonal and we wouldn't hesitate to recommend her in a heartbeat. Thank you for bringing closure to our case and for supporting us one hundred percent. We were informed at every stage within the case and knew we were in safe professional hands throughout. Many thanks, Mr and Mrs Appleton.

Asoka T

Very professional and a friendly team, specially Helen Lennon who handled my case.

Carl R

I was very happy with the way they handled my case and still got the result even in these hard times where having at the moment thank you to all involved and I’d recommend you to others

Angie L

Williamsons solicitors were professional, caring and efficient. They dealt with what was, a very upsetting experience I had via medical negligence. They kept me up to date, enquired about my well-being and were always available to either speak to me when I had concerns or answered my emails. They ensured that the compensation I finally received was in my best interests by advising what they thought was a too low first offer of settlement. I cannot thank them enough for the way they handled my case and for pushing for a better higher settlement figure. I would definitely use them again should I ever be in a position to need them Thank you so much.

Suzanne W

Would definitely recommend this company, very knowledgeable on all aspects. Extremely helpful with a caring and kind approach, made me feel at ease and comfortable. I was always kept informed at every stage of my case Very happy and would 100% use them for any other matter if needed Thankyou

Mrs Baker

Excellent service, made to feel very welcome, looked after from the very first minute.. would highly recommend to anyone looking for conveyancing on a property or setting up a will.

Mr W F

alison craven, provided excellent service and went above and beyond to make sure my will was sorted quickly with this current situation we find ourselves in. great,proffessional work.


Used them a few times for conveyancing and this time, for our Wills. Excellent service as always.

Mr Longhorn

Very helpful and supportive and kept me informed all through the process; it went very smoothly and that owes a lot to how they managed it in such a professional manner

Mr and Mrs Hutson

Throughly pleased with all aspects of the service, always updated on every change, or new information regarding the sale of our house and purchase of the new property. Everything went smoothly and couldn't fault the attention to detail and customer service. Thank you to Beth and all who assisted in the process.

Gary R

Efficiency, friendly and supportive Karen Saunders gave excellent advice with no nonsense answers to my enquires and difficult decisions

Mr Adams

Efficient and friendly from start to speedy finish

Sue W

In May 2017 after a long & painful road of recovery wich is still ongoing today. I finally plucked up the courage & decided to approach Willams Solicitors as I felt that there was something very wrong with the poor service i received in March 2015 from 1 1 1. Having made two calls over the weekend. Inspite of right leg being in immense pain & stone cold I was told that i had probably pulled a muscle nothing they could do for me & to visit my GP So after a weekend of struggling with pain i visited my GP to be rushed to Hospital with absent pulses in the right foot. On examination there was a blood clot on my right knee caused by Critical ischaemia nothing whatsoever to do with a pulled muscle. I was told i needed a thrombosis procedure to dissolve blood clot if this was unsuccessful they would have no other choice than to amputate below the right knee I was devastated Thanks to this amazing solicitors who advised me that they felt 1 1 1 had possibly been neglectful & would like to take my case on. With an outstanding Nick Gray becoming my solicitor & the amazing team of experts including Julian Matthews an absolutely brilliant barrister Vascular surgeons experts Professor sir Peter Bell & Professor Shearman who were also amazing in highlighting the Hospital were neglectful as well & need not of removed my leg & could have avoided amputation. All of the other team of experts who helped with this case as well were very good In fact I had a fantastic team i couldn't fault Williams solicitors at all. They proved all 3 defendants to be negligent & they got me an amazing settlement far more than I could ever dreamed of & in a short space of time A huge thanks to Nick Gray & his fantastic team inside & outside Williams I can start rebuilding my life knowing I can afford to have & get the very best in making life a lot easier. I can't have my leg back but I can now smile again knowing life won't be a struggle. I would strongly recommend this Solicitors to anybody who needs a professional honest caring & worth every penny Solicitor you will not be disappointed. Once again a massive Thank you to Nick Gray & all his team ❤ Sue Willoughby

Mrs Pannhausen

Very impressed with Suzanne, Beth & Natalie at the Bridlington Branch, they give 100%, will use them again & recommend them to friends & family.

Mr and Mrs Preston

Williamson’s provide an excellent service at a reasonable price. Very easy to deal with and excellent communication was provided all the way through the transaction. Just what you need in a solicitor.


I would highly recommend Williamsons Solicitors, Gordon represented me for my case and was excellent. Always on the end of the phone when I need him. overall top job thankyou. Mr Lloyd Milner

Mr & M

Very friendly and efficient service always replying to any queries and emails on the same day. If solicitor not in still dealt with by other staff. Would definitely recommend and will use again

Mr Andrew W

They have handled my house moving with professionalism and friendliness and kept in touch regularly to keep me updated I would strongly recommend them 👍

Mr Deeley

Very good service from everyone I dealt with at Williamson's. They were very quick and responsive and gave that extra push to get me completed before the Christmas holiday! A very nice Christmas present for me!