fbpx Skip to main content
CALL US: 01482 323 697
Williamsons News

Human Rights in the UK – Meghan Markle: A case study

21 January 2020

Blog, Immigration

Much has been said about Meghan Markle in the media in the last couple of years and even more in the last week or so, and therefore it is easy to lose sight of the fact that she is a human, with human needs and wants for herself and her husband and child; and indeed, for them as a family unit.

Many think of the necessity for human rights to protect the poor, or people who have been deprived of the right to liberty through imprisonment for example. However, it is easy to see from the following, just how it can also apply to those with fame and a healthy bank balance.

Meghan Markle - A case studyWe look below at Meghan as an individual and look at the rights that she may want to rely on. These are arguably rights that are currently being infringed.

The Human Rights Act 1998 and the source of this act (the European Convention of Human Rights), which can easily be argued to be much more robust than our domestic law version, are so important to protect. It is all too easy to see how these basic rights need to be protected. Especially in a world of social media, where everyone reading and commenting feels that they have a right to an opinion on someone’s life and decisions.

Right to respect for Private and Family Life (Article 8):

This is the most obvious of the Rights, as detailed in the ECHR which might apply, and is often at the core of many cases in immigration where families may be separated, but for a UK visa. For Meghan, however, the word private is of paramount importance. Those around her, even some of those in the media who subject her to such treatment, Words have Powerwould admit that her privacy is often infringed. Not by any one individual necessarily, but by a barrage of the many interested general public, encouraged and enabled by a greedy and lucrative media machine. Often people will say that she chose to marry into the Royal Family and by its very nature, she gave up any right to privacy. Should this be the same for her son, however? Or did his father Prince Harry choose to be born into this situation where his privacy was hampered, at best, and non-existent, at worst? Is there a scenario where Harry could’ve married anyone other than Meghan and would they have had a private life or full family life?

The job for a judge in this situation would start with the question: Does she, and do they, have a right to a private life and family life? We would hope the answer to this would be affirmative. The next question might be: Is this right being infringed? One might argue it absolutely is, as I doubt many people could live under such a microscope as they must, and not let this affect their daily lives, and how they therefore treat their child and each other. The next question, determined by previous precedent case law looking at the function of Article 8, might be: Is this infringement proportionate when considering the public interest in allowing this to happen. I would say it is not. Others may disagree….

Right to Liberty and Security (Article 5):

This right may be looked at in its broadest meaning in the context of Meghan Markle’s life. Should she have to live like other senior members of the Royal Family have in the past, and perform public duties regularly, just because she married into the Family? Immigration - Human RightsOr should she, alternatively, be allowed to choose how she spends her time? Kate, for example, very quickly resumed her Royal ‘duties’ after the birth of all three children. Meghan, and indeed Kate herself, may have wished to spend more time with her young baby. As anyone with children knows, these years pass far too fast. Should this not be her choice and not the choice of the UK government, her extended (Royal) family or tradition?

The huge media and press presence and influence in their lives, can also be seen as a threat to their liberty, especially at certain times of the year and after any period of controversy. It remains a valid question as to whether this media and press influence infringes the right to liberty and whether this is a proportionate infringement when weighed against the public interest. The issue of Right to Security I deal with below due to its overlap with the Right to Life.

Prohibition of torture (Article 3):

This right includes the protection from inhumane and degrading treatment. Many would argue that this is a misapplication of this particular article, as in most cases it is held for very serious cases of physical or mental harm. Williamsons Solicitors - Civil LitigationI’m sure it could be argued by a decent Human Rights lawyer worth their salt, that some of the social media trolling, daily verbal harassment and press coverage could border on what might be called inhumane or degrading treatment and indeed Meghan and Harry have alluded to mental health problems emerging due the same. Are we really still chanting the mantra: Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me…?

Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14):

Of the many articles written recently about Meghan, some defend her position and the recent joint decision of her and her husband to step back from public office. Immigration - DiscriminationThey have spoken of the constant torment of discriminative posts and invective that particularly she has had to endure due to her race, background and the mixed race of their son. Indeed, it was less than a week after Archie had been born that Danny Baker was sacked for retweeting a racist picture depicting the Royals new born son as a monkey in a suit (!) Can we protect her and the family in general from this discrimination when it is so widespread and centres so firmly on her and them as individuals and as a family?

Right to Life (Article 2):

Now this point is obviously very much dependant on the specific facts of Meghan’s life and only she, those close to her and her security personnel would know the detail of any threats and whether these should be taken seriously. British and Canadian flagsIt is however, a factor, in relation to how she, Harry and Archie might manage their daily lives. In a sense, wherever and however they decide to live, they may never be able to get away from the fact that they will be under threat of attack by those around them. This threat can- and I’m certain does- frequently amount to threats to their lives. Do we not owe any individual, whatever they decide to do, protection from threats to their life? I guess the big question for the UK government, the Royal Family and indeed potentially the government wherever they decide to live (should they really intend to live as ordinary citizens) might be: Who pays for this protection…?  In reality, it is more likely that private protection will be organised and potentially paid for by Meghan and Harry themselves.

Freedom of expression (Article 10) and Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11):

These last rights provide possibly the weakest arguments but are still a factor when looking at the Royal Family in general and how we (as their citizens and as a collective group) expect them to behave. Happy Family - Williamsons SolicitorsDo they really have a right to say what they like? See who they like? It might be argued that they can but are they then subject to the same old judgment and social media barrage as before, which takes us back to early arguments of Article 8 and Article 3.

Whichever way you look at human rights, you can see that they are there for a reason: to protect the very basic standards of life that we should all expect to have. It can also be seen that money and fame does not necessarily guard against this, and for some at least, may make matters worse.

Contact Us Back to top
Read some reviews from our clients

4.90 Average

191 Reviews

Miss S

Excellent service from Beth Dyson despite all the pressures of the Covid lockdown. Beth carried out conveyancing of my sale and purchase very thoroughly and efficiently with good communication and always in a helpful and friendly manner. Many thanks.

Joanna H

Well from the moment I met Wayne Walker his professionalism,clarity of thought, and aim to do the best job he can were all evident. He has been involved with my family for five years nearly and has always made me feel as though my views were relevant and integral to furthering the case. Wayne has highly developed organisational skills and we always felt just ‘looked after’ by Wayne snd Williamsons in getting through the very worst of times. Wayne sometimes needed to encourage me to look at things from a different perspective and he always achieved this with firm kindness. Wayne is a great professional but more importantly a fundamentally great human being. I will always recommend Williamsons and especially on the subject of clinical negligence I will always recommend Wayne. Full job well done start to finish. Thanks Wayne there are no words. Jo Hogg (Polly’s mum)


Williamsons Solicitors supported our family to succeed to a very high level. We cannot thank Sarah Jackson enough for her incredible support, dedication and commitment to understanding the finest detail of our case. Her dedication was phonememonal and we wouldn't hesitate to recommend her in a heartbeat. Thank you for bringing closure to our case and for supporting us one hundred percent. We were informed at every stage within the case and knew we were in safe professional hands throughout. Many thanks, Mr and Mrs Appleton.

Asoka T

Very professional and a friendly team, specially Helen Lennon who handled my case.

Carl R

I was very happy with the way they handled my case and still got the result even in these hard times where having at the moment thank you to all involved and I’d recommend you to others

Angie L

Williamsons solicitors were professional, caring and efficient. They dealt with what was, a very upsetting experience I had via medical negligence. They kept me up to date, enquired about my well-being and were always available to either speak to me when I had concerns or answered my emails. They ensured that the compensation I finally received was in my best interests by advising what they thought was a too low first offer of settlement. I cannot thank them enough for the way they handled my case and for pushing for a better higher settlement figure. I would definitely use them again should I ever be in a position to need them Thank you so much.

Suzanne W

Would definitely recommend this company, very knowledgeable on all aspects. Extremely helpful with a caring and kind approach, made me feel at ease and comfortable. I was always kept informed at every stage of my case Very happy and would 100% use them for any other matter if needed Thankyou

Mrs Baker

Excellent service, made to feel very welcome, looked after from the very first minute.. would highly recommend to anyone looking for conveyancing on a property or setting up a will.

Mr W F

alison craven, provided excellent service and went above and beyond to make sure my will was sorted quickly with this current situation we find ourselves in. great,proffessional work.


Used them a few times for conveyancing and this time, for our Wills. Excellent service as always.

Mr Longhorn

Very helpful and supportive and kept me informed all through the process; it went very smoothly and that owes a lot to how they managed it in such a professional manner

Mr and Mrs Hutson

Throughly pleased with all aspects of the service, always updated on every change, or new information regarding the sale of our house and purchase of the new property. Everything went smoothly and couldn't fault the attention to detail and customer service. Thank you to Beth and all who assisted in the process.

Gary R

Efficiency, friendly and supportive Karen Saunders gave excellent advice with no nonsense answers to my enquires and difficult decisions

Mr Adams

Efficient and friendly from start to speedy finish

Sue W

In May 2017 after a long & painful road of recovery wich is still ongoing today. I finally plucked up the courage & decided to approach Willams Solicitors as I felt that there was something very wrong with the poor service i received in March 2015 from 1 1 1. Having made two calls over the weekend. Inspite of right leg being in immense pain & stone cold I was told that i had probably pulled a muscle nothing they could do for me & to visit my GP So after a weekend of struggling with pain i visited my GP to be rushed to Hospital with absent pulses in the right foot. On examination there was a blood clot on my right knee caused by Critical ischaemia nothing whatsoever to do with a pulled muscle. I was told i needed a thrombosis procedure to dissolve blood clot if this was unsuccessful they would have no other choice than to amputate below the right knee I was devastated Thanks to this amazing solicitors who advised me that they felt 1 1 1 had possibly been neglectful & would like to take my case on. With an outstanding Nick Gray becoming my solicitor & the amazing team of experts including Julian Matthews an absolutely brilliant barrister Vascular surgeons experts Professor sir Peter Bell & Professor Shearman who were also amazing in highlighting the Hospital were neglectful as well & need not of removed my leg & could have avoided amputation. All of the other team of experts who helped with this case as well were very good In fact I had a fantastic team i couldn't fault Williams solicitors at all. They proved all 3 defendants to be negligent & they got me an amazing settlement far more than I could ever dreamed of & in a short space of time A huge thanks to Nick Gray & his fantastic team inside & outside Williams I can start rebuilding my life knowing I can afford to have & get the very best in making life a lot easier. I can't have my leg back but I can now smile again knowing life won't be a struggle. I would strongly recommend this Solicitors to anybody who needs a professional honest caring & worth every penny Solicitor you will not be disappointed. Once again a massive Thank you to Nick Gray & all his team ❤ Sue Willoughby

Mrs Pannhausen

Very impressed with Suzanne, Beth & Natalie at the Bridlington Branch, they give 100%, will use them again & recommend them to friends & family.

Mr and Mrs Preston

Williamson’s provide an excellent service at a reasonable price. Very easy to deal with and excellent communication was provided all the way through the transaction. Just what you need in a solicitor.


I would highly recommend Williamsons Solicitors, Gordon represented me for my case and was excellent. Always on the end of the phone when I need him. overall top job thankyou. Mr Lloyd Milner

Mr & M

Very friendly and efficient service always replying to any queries and emails on the same day. If solicitor not in still dealt with by other staff. Would definitely recommend and will use again

Mr Andrew W

They have handled my house moving with professionalism and friendliness and kept in touch regularly to keep me updated I would strongly recommend them 👍

Mr Deeley

Very good service from everyone I dealt with at Williamson's. They were very quick and responsive and gave that extra push to get me completed before the Christmas holiday! A very nice Christmas present for me!